Sponsored Links

Rabu, 20 Desember 2017

Sponsored Links

Planck's Law
src: ozonedepletiontheory.info

In physics, the Rayleigh-Jeans Law is an approximation to the spectral radiance of electromagnetic radiation as a function of wavelength from a black body at a given temperature through classical arguments. For wavelength ? {\displaystyle \lambda } , it is:

B ? ( T ) = 2 c k B T ? 4 , {\displaystyle B_{\lambda }(T)={\frac {2ck_{\mathrm {B} }T}{\lambda ^{4}}},}

where B ? {\displaystyle B_{\lambda }} is the spectral radiance; the power emitted per unit emitting area, per steradian, per unit wavelength, c {\displaystyle c} is the speed of light, k B {\displaystyle k_{\mathrm {B} }} is the Boltzmann constant and T {\displaystyle T} is the temperature in kelvins. For frequency ? {\displaystyle \nu } , the expression is instead

B ? ( T ) = 2 ? 2 k B T c 2 . {\displaystyle B_{\nu }(T)={\frac {2\nu ^{2}k_{\mathrm {B} }T}{c^{2}}}.}

The Rayleigh-Jeans law agrees with experimental results at large wavelengths (low frequencies) but strongly disagrees at short wavelengths (high frequencies). This inconsistency between observations and the predictions of classical physics is commonly known as the ultraviolet catastrophe. Its resolution in 1900 with the derivation by Max Planck of Planck's law, which gives the correct radiation at all frequencies, was a foundational aspect of the development of quantum mechanics in the early 20th century.


Video Rayleigh-Jeans law



Historical development

In 1900, the British physicist Lord Rayleigh derived the ?-4 dependence of the Rayleigh-Jeans law based on classical physical arguments and empirical facts. A more complete derivation, which included the proportionality constant, was presented by Rayleigh and Sir James Jeans in 1905. The Rayleigh-Jeans law revealed an important error in physics theory of the time. The law predicted an energy output that diverges towards infinity as wavelength approaches zero (as frequency tends to infinity). Measurements of the spectral emission of actual black bodies revealed that the emission agreed with the Rayleigh-Jeans law at low frequencies but diverged at high frequencies; reaching a maximum and then falling with frequency, so the total energy emitted is finite.


Maps Rayleigh-Jeans law



Comparison to Planck's law

In 1900 Max Planck empirically obtained an expression for black-body radiation expressed in terms of wavelength ? = c/? (Planck's law):

B ? ( T ) = 2 h c 2 ? 5   1 e h c ? k B T - 1 , {\displaystyle B_{\lambda }(T)={\frac {2hc^{2}}{\lambda ^{5}}}~{\frac {1}{e^{\frac {hc}{\lambda k_{\mathrm {B} }T}}-1}},}

where h is the Planck constant and kB the Boltzmann constant. The Planck's law does not suffer from an ultraviolet catastrophe, and agrees well with the experimental data, but its full significance (which ultimately led to quantum theory) was only appreciated several years later. Since,

e x = 1 + x + x 2 2 ! + x 3 3 ! + ? . {\displaystyle e^{x}=1+x+{x^{2} \over 2!}+{x^{3} \over 3!}+\cdots .}

then in the limit of high temperatures or long wavelengths, the term in the exponential becomes small, and the exponential is well approximated with the Taylor polynomial's first-order term,

e h c ? k B T ? 1 + h c ? k B T . {\displaystyle e^{\frac {hc}{\lambda k_{\mathrm {B} }T}}\approx 1+{\frac {hc}{\lambda k_{\mathrm {B} }T}}.}

So,

1 e h c ? k B T - 1 ? 1 h c ? k B T = ? k B T h c . {\displaystyle {\frac {1}{e^{\frac {hc}{\lambda k_{\mathrm {B} }T}}-1}}\approx {\frac {1}{\frac {hc}{\lambda k_{\mathrm {B} }T}}}={\frac {\lambda k_{\mathrm {B} }T}{hc}}.}

This results in Planck's blackbody formula reducing to

B ? ( T ) = 2 c k B T ? 4 , {\displaystyle B_{\lambda }(T)={\frac {2ck_{\mathrm {B} }T}{\lambda ^{4}}},}

which is identical to the classically derived Rayleigh-Jeans expression.

The same argument can be applied to the blackbody radiation expressed in terms of frequency ? = c/?. In the limit of small frequencies, that is h ? << k B T {\displaystyle h\nu \ll k_{\mathrm {B} }T} ,

B ? ( T ) = 2 h ? 3 c 2 1 e h ? k B T - 1 ? 2 h ? 3 c 2 ? k B T h ? = 2 ? 2 k B T c 2 . {\displaystyle B_{\nu }(T)={\frac {2h\nu ^{3}}{c^{2}}}{\frac {1}{e^{\frac {h\nu }{k_{\mathrm {B} }T}}-1}}\approx {\frac {2h\nu ^{3}}{c^{2}}}\cdot {\frac {k_{\mathrm {B} }T}{h\nu }}={\frac {2\nu ^{2}k_{\mathrm {B} }T}{c^{2}}}.}

This last expression is the Rayleigh-Jeans law in the limit of small frequencies.


Radio Astronomy Lecture Number 1
src: web.njit.edu


Consistency of frequency and wavelength dependent expressions

When comparing the frequency and wavelength dependent expressions of the Rayleigh-Jeans law it is important to remember that

d P d ? = B ? ( T ) {\displaystyle {\frac {dP}{d{\lambda }}}=B_{\lambda }(T)} , and
d P d ? = B ? ( T ) {\displaystyle {\frac {dP}{d{\nu }}}=B_{\nu }(T)}

Therefore,

B ? ( T ) ? B ? ( T ) {\displaystyle B_{\lambda }(T)\neq B_{\nu }(T)}

even after substituting the value ? = c / ? {\displaystyle \lambda =c/\nu } , because B ? ( T ) {\displaystyle B_{\lambda }(T)} has units of energy emitted per unit time per unit area of emitting surface, per unit solid angle, per unit wavelength, whereas B ? ( T ) {\displaystyle B_{\nu }(T)} has units of energy emitted per unit time per unit area of emitting surface, per unit solid angle, per unit frequency. To be consistent, we must use the equality

B ? d ? = d P = B ? d ? {\displaystyle B_{\lambda }\,d\lambda =dP=B_{\nu }\,d\nu }

where both sides now have units of power (energy emitted per unit time) per unit area of emitting surface, per unit solid angle.

Starting with the Rayleigh-Jeans law in terms of wavelength we get

B ? ( T ) = B ? ( T ) × d ? d ? {\displaystyle B_{\lambda }(T)=B_{\nu }(T)\times {\frac {d\nu }{d\lambda }}}

where

d ? d ? = d d ? ( c ? ) = - c ? 2 {\displaystyle {\frac {d\nu }{d\lambda }}={\frac {d}{d\lambda }}\left({\frac {c}{\lambda }}\right)=-{\frac {c}{\lambda ^{2}}}} .

This leads us to find:

B ? ( T ) = 2 k B T ( c ? ) 2 c 2 × c ? 2 = 2 c k B T ? 4 {\displaystyle B_{\lambda }(T)={\frac {2k_{\mathrm {B} }T\left({\frac {c}{\lambda }}\right)^{2}}{c^{2}}}\times {\frac {c}{\lambda ^{2}}}={\frac {2ck_{\mathrm {B} }T}{\lambda ^{4}}}} .

leggi Wien e Rayleigh Jeans - YouTube
src: i.ytimg.com


Other forms of Rayleigh-Jeans law

Depending on the application, the Planck function can be expressed in 3 different forms. The first involves energy emitted per unit time per unit area of emitting surface, per unit solid angle, per spectral unit. In this form, the Planck function and associated Rayleigh-Jeans limits are given by

B ? ( T ) = 2 h c 2 ? 5   1 e h c ? k B T - 1 ? 2 c k B T ? 4 {\displaystyle B_{\lambda }(T)={\frac {2hc^{2}}{\lambda ^{5}}}~{\frac {1}{e^{\frac {hc}{\lambda k_{\mathrm {B} }T}}-1}}\approx {\frac {2ck_{\mathrm {B} }T}{\lambda ^{4}}}}

or

B ? ( T ) = 2 h ? 3 c 2 1 e h ? k B T - 1 ? 2 k B T ? 2 c 2 {\displaystyle B_{\nu }(T)={\frac {2h\nu ^{3}}{c^{2}}}{\frac {1}{e^{\frac {h\nu }{k_{\mathrm {B} }T}}-1}}\approx {\frac {2k_{\mathrm {B} }T\nu ^{2}}{c^{2}}}}

Alternatively, Planck's law can be written as an expression I ( ? , T ) = ? B ? ( T ) {\displaystyle I(\nu ,T)=\pi B_{\nu }(T)} for emitted power integrated over all solid angles. In this form, the Planck function and associated Rayleigh-Jeans limits are given by

I ( ? , T ) = 2 ? h c 2 ? 5   1 e h c ? k B T - 1 ? 2 ? c k B T ? 4 {\displaystyle I(\lambda ,T)={\frac {2\pi hc^{2}}{\lambda ^{5}}}~{\frac {1}{e^{\frac {hc}{\lambda k_{\mathrm {B} }T}}-1}}\approx {\frac {2\pi ck_{\mathrm {B} }T}{\lambda ^{4}}}}

or

I ( ? , T ) = 2 ? h ? 3 c 2 1 e h ? k B T - 1 ? 2 ? k B T ? 2 c 2 {\displaystyle I(\nu ,T)={\frac {2\pi h\nu ^{3}}{c^{2}}}{\frac {1}{e^{\frac {h\nu }{k_{\mathrm {B} }T}}-1}}\approx {\frac {2\pi k_{\mathrm {B} }T\nu ^{2}}{c^{2}}}}

In other cases, Planck's law is written as u ( ? , T ) = 4 ? c B ? ( T ) {\displaystyle u(\nu ,T)={\frac {4\pi }{c}}B_{\nu }(T)} for energy per unit volume (energy density). In this form, the Planck function and associated Rayleigh-Jeans limits are given by

u ( ? , T ) = 8 ? h c ? 5   1 e h c ? k B T - 1 ? 8 ? k B T ? 4 {\displaystyle u(\lambda ,T)={\frac {8\pi hc}{\lambda ^{5}}}~{\frac {1}{e^{\frac {hc}{\lambda k_{\mathrm {B} }T}}-1}}\approx {\frac {8\pi k_{\mathrm {B} }T}{\lambda ^{4}}}}

or

u ( ? , T ) = 8 ? h ? 3 c 3 1 e h ? k B T - 1 ? 8 ? k B T ? 2 c 3 {\displaystyle u(\nu ,T)={\frac {8\pi h\nu ^{3}}{c^{3}}}{\frac {1}{e^{\frac {h\nu }{k_{\mathrm {B} }T}}-1}}\approx {\frac {8\pi k_{\mathrm {B} }T\nu ^{2}}{c^{3}}}}

Radio Astronomy Lecture Number 1
src: web.njit.edu


See also

  • Stefan-Boltzmann law
  • Wien's displacement law
  • Sakuma-Hattori equation

Plan for Today (AP Physics 2) Ch 24, 27, and 28 Review Day More ...
src: slideplayer.com


References

4.Concept of modern PHYSICS by Arthur Beiser,MC raw hill education.


Forest Fires
src: www.eumetrain.org


External links

  • Derivation at HyperPhysics

Source of the article : Wikipedia

Comments
0 Comments